![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Asteriods In or Out | |||
| Yes |
|
21 | 100.00% |
| Not yet |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Asteroids@home
Asteroids@home
Quote:
Received an email about this project. wodan has contacted Josef Durech (director of the Asteroids@home project at Charles University in Prague) and he is very keen to have the project added. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just joined... downloaded 1 Wu... will let you know in a bit.
__________________
Crunchers Inc |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thank you Rusty for starting this thread.
Yes, it seems as very interesting project. I'll have to admit I have not run the project too long, but so far I always gotten tasks for both linux and windows. (60K task available atm, rather short tasks). The answer from Mr. Josef Durech was that he believes that the project fulfills all requirements: (The project must: 1 be active 2 accept new members and teams immediately upon registration 3 have parsable team stats 4 have team stats that are updated regularly * provide a client program which runs on a local PC The project must not: * be a keylogger or mouseclick counter * have a maximum number of teams or members) Sorry to say, I have no idea how to confirm point 3 and 4, but the project is recorded on boincstats (down for the moment) and free-dc as far as I can understand. PS: I have informed Josef Durech of this thread. May thee Ninjas come to a wise (and positive ) conclusion.Best regards wodan, (Team Norway). Last edited by wodan; 20th December 2012 at 12:06 AM. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wodan,
adding projects to the Vault is a community decision. If bioncstats, free-dc have the stats then the Vault can steal them too. Thanks for the email mate. Invite your Team Norway mates to join the conversation. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Looks like an average 2 - 8 hrs per WU... granted... also running other stuff alongside BOINC. Seems to play well with other projects within BOINC.
Last edited by cswchan; 20th December 2012 at 02:53 PM. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just joined the project 10 minutes ago to check it out. Went back to the home page and voila I'm "user of the day". Must not be a lot of users yet. Nice way to start at a project though. I'll report back when I know more. One positive thing I noticed is that they're using a fixed credit system instead of the crazy credit-new. Kudos for that.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I asked Josef about the difference of asteroids@home and orbit@home, not to important in respect to the requirements but still. I invited him to this thread. Here is the answer:
" I don't know much about the Orbit@home project but the main difference is that Orbit@home concentrates on computing orbits of asteroids in the Solar System, Asteroids@home studies shapes and spins of asteroids with well-known orbits. In order to derive shape and spin for an asteroid from its brightness, the asteroid has to be observed many times over couple of years, so its orbit has to be known. So we do not compute any orbits or orbital evolution, we take this information form the database of minor planets. Regards Josef " |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just joined and got some tasks immediately. First thing I always want to know : checkpoints? And yes, the app checkpoints frequently. Stats are available in the regular BOINC XML format.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
I saw this one a few months ago when looking for new projects but they only had a Linux app back then. I couldn't run it, but I don't remember seeing any issues back then other than people asking for a windows app and asking about the purpose of the project and comparing it to orbit@home. Testing it on a win7 and server 2008 systems, no issues so far....
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's been just over 1 week since I have started running this... seems to play well, still has lots of WUs... although they ran out for a few hours a few days ago, but, came back in no time at all...
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Been running it for 10 days, so far no problems and WUs are <4hrs. Has someone already made a "Team Ninja" team for this project?
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Team Ninja created.
Congrats Janus7 |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks. That was my 1st one.
Congrats for your UotD on Leiden Classical. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Seems to be working fine after the excess WU pending situation was cleaned up.
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
I started running this project almost 6 months ago. It started out pretty rough. Tons of pending work. Unresponsive admins who's only response was to dismiss the feedback.
But that changed a few months ago. The admins started doing something other than ignore the volunteers and started making changes to address the problems. Finally they released a windows client so the majority of crunchers can crunch. I can not really recommend this project as it would most likely fall victim to the vault syndrome, but then again I can't say much against it either. Last edited by fractal; 1st January 2013 at 01:31 AM. Reason: Removed incorrect information, I was thinking of a different project. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|