![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Holly/Jessica - Huntley guilty
Just seen the news - Huntley found guilty of two counts of murder - receives two life sentences.
It turns out he had a lot of "form" - but Humberside Police failed to pass this information on to Cambridgeshire Police when he applied for the job of school caretaker.
__________________
- Never try to out-stubborn a cat - A giraffe is a horse designed by a committee - An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications attributed to Lazarus Long ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Stomp of the week in Folding@Home   Dump of the month in OGR-27  Last edited by Meadmaker; 17th December 2003 at 11:49 AM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Can't say i'm surprised....
kind of case that makes you in favour of death penalites I found it interesting his fantastical defense and the definitions of "beyond reasonable doubt" what he claimed was just about concievable and no one was alive to contradict him Yet clearly the jury was correct in finding that beyond any "reasonable" doubt he was lying.jema |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
whats the story guys?
who is this bloke? |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
just saw it on the news here also...
aweful case.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
What you see is not always what you get! |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I gather that the verdict was a majority one, with one dissenter I wonder what they think now that they know his past?It does make me think of the first Birmingham 6 trial where the jury were quite right to convict beyond a "reasonable" doubt based on the evidence they heard, it was still conceivable they were innocent, but you had to believe that both the confessions and the convincing "forensic" evidence were false, and no reasonable person could easily do this. In this case because Huntely had access to all the evidence against him, he was able to construct a fantastic story that "explained" things. I'd guess if the defence did not know all the prosecution had and Huntely was put on the stand he would have been shot down in flames quickly! Of course the counter to this is that it could allow prosecutions to introdouce dodgy foresnsics that sound convincing and need serious effort and time for a defense to refute. jema |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|