Team Ninja Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Team Ninja Bulletin Board > DC Vault > New Projects

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 30th July 2011, 08:35 AM
Rusty Rusty is offline
Owner
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 11,199
LHC@home 2.0(6T)



http://boinc01.cern.ch/


Quote:
LHC@home 2.0 is a volunteer computing platform for physicists working at the Large Hadron Collider - the world's largest particle accelerator - at CERN, the European Particle Physics Laboratory. This platform will host several sub-projects for different LHC physics groups.

LHC@home 2.0 is an extension of the LHC@home platform, launched in 2004 to help physicists simulate protons beam dynamics in the LHC. At that time, doing full-fledged simulations of particle collisions was beyond the scope of volunteer computing. But the evolution of computer software and hardware, and in particular the use of virtual machine technology, has enabled a breakthrough...LHC@home 2.0!

As a result you can now be part of a global effort to simulate data that physicists will use in their analysis of LHC data, by running simulations of particle collisions on your home computer. The first project to run on the LHC@home 2.0 platform - currently in test phase - is called Test4Theory.
__________________
RUSTY


Team Ninja Forever : Once a Ninja, always a Ninja - Team Ninja

"I'm a SAS NINJA"

Drafted to the SAS
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 30th July 2011, 05:08 PM
10:13 10:13 is offline
Moderator
Scottish twit, extremis
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 4,678
Hmmmm .... might have to check this one out.
__________________

Team Ninja Stats Site
Sig courtesy of Chelle ... I love it to death
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 30th July 2011, 05:54 PM
Meadmaker Meadmaker is offline
Owner
Feel the need for MEAD!
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: A cave in Northern Lordaeron
Posts: 21,765
The more the merrier - as long as they're reliable
__________________
- Never try to out-stubborn a cat
- A giraffe is a horse designed by a committee
- An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications

attributed to Lazarus Long




Dump of the month in 17OB  
Stomp of the week in World Community Grid   Stomp of the month in World Community Grid  
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19th August 2011, 11:42 AM
10:13 10:13 is offline
Moderator
Scottish twit, extremis
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 4,678
This is the most recent news from the LHC@Home 2.0 site:

Overwhelming interest

Fri, 08/12/2011 - 19:19 — Daniel Lombraña... Interest in LHC@home 2.0 has been overwhelming, following the huge press coverage that a brief mention in a CERN press release got us. Thank you, everyone! Yesterday we reached nearly 8000 registered volunteers, which saturated our server. So we had to put further eager participants on hold while we sorted out how to handle this huge amount of support.
We're going to open gradually to more participants in the coming days. In the meantime, if you are new to the field of volunteer computing, we warmly encourage you to browse here some of the many other exciting science projects you can contribute to, using the same BOINC platform that LHC@home is running on.
The LHC@home 2.0 Team


So, at present they are not accepting new registrations and it will only open gradually. I'll keep checking on this project ... just because it sounds really neat.


10:13
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19th August 2011, 12:54 PM
Meadmaker Meadmaker is offline
Owner
Feel the need for MEAD!
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: A cave in Northern Lordaeron
Posts: 21,765
Already there
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 8th October 2012, 10:34 PM
iconized iconized is offline
Ninja Recruit
Dutch Power Cows
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by 10:13 View Post
I suppose the real question (or one of them): Is t4t suitable for inclusion? Is work consistent enough for the Vault? Has anyone been running the project and what are their thoughts? And lastly, if t4t is suitable, should t4t and lhc be combined as a single project or be two projects. I'd lean in the former direction myself, at least at first thought.
So what do others think?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 9th October 2012, 03:58 PM
Qazwaplol Qazwaplol is offline
Neophyte
Dutch Power Cows
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 11
As for adding T4T:
Yes, the project ticks all the requirement boxes (kinda hard not too). It's stable (as long as you don't update to the latest virtualbox version), there is work and active project admins.

However I am against adding it to the vault for two reasons:
1. Officially the project is still in BETA.
2. not a fan of the client. It's a VirtualBox VM, so besides having BOINC installed you also need to manually install VirtualBox. Then the massive download starts, you need at least 9GB of free space BOINC can use.


As for combining stats:
I see no reason why you would combine them, T4T and 6T are two separate projects that do their own thing and have different project organisations/admins.

It could be seen as 2 applications from one project (like WCG is one project with alot of different applications). But since both are separated by CERN why bother with the extra work? and also make the vaults stats incomparable with all other stats sites in the process.

Last edited by Qazwaplol; 9th October 2012 at 05:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11th October 2012, 04:17 AM
Razor_FX_II's Avatar
Razor_FX_II Razor_FX_II is offline
[H]ard|OCP
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qazwaplol View Post
However I am against adding it to the vault for two reasons:
1. Officially the project is still in BETA.
2. not a fan of the client. It's a VirtualBox VM, so besides having BOINC installed you also need to manually install VirtualBox. Then the massive download starts, you need at least 9GB of free space BOINC can use.


As for combining stats:
I see no reason why you would combine them, T4T and 6T are two separate projects that do their own thing and have different project organisations/admins.

It could be seen as 2 applications from one project (like WCG is one project with alot of different applications). But since both are separated by CERN why bother with the extra work? and also make the vaults stats incomparable with all other stats sites in the process.
+1
__________________
Proud Member of Team [H]ard|OCP & the [H]ard DC Commandos

Last edited by Razor_FX_II; 16th October 2012 at 09:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11th October 2012, 11:27 AM
DigiK-oz DigiK-oz is offline
Dutch Power Cows
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: netherlands
Posts: 104
In looking over the project website, I must say I am opposed to adding it to the vault, for 2 reasons:

- It requires virtualbox software. It complicates things for new users, creates a dependency on distinct versions (they now advise against using 4.2.0, for instance), and I need VMWare on my workstation, and don't really want to install another hypervisor as they might interfere (I did install it on a testbox, and it seems ok, though. But what with future versions?)
- If I understand correctly (reading their FAQ), all tests run for exactly 24 hours - WITHOUT checkpoints. This, for me, is a showstopper. In general, I think checkpoints should be a requirement for inclusion in the vault, or at least for tasks running longer than an hour or so.

As for combining stats : No. They are two seperate projects. Apart from that, what if one of them runs out of work or otherwise fails to meet vault requirements? That would mean removing both of them from the vault, even though one of them still qualifies?
__________________
DC-Vault statistics
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 13th October 2012, 11:47 PM
Rusty Rusty is offline
Owner
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 11,199
OK Sorry for the delay. I have added LHC 6T to the stats collection.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 14th October 2012, 05:27 PM
Xaverius's Avatar
Xaverius Xaverius is offline
Dutch Power Runner! Uhm, Cow
DPC - crew member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Arnhem, the Netherlands
Posts: 98
--edit-- sorry I was confused about what project we were talking about

Last edited by Xaverius; 15th October 2012 at 12:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 14th October 2012, 05:31 PM
DigiK-oz DigiK-oz is offline
Dutch Power Cows
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: netherlands
Posts: 104
6T is the original LHC project, which does not require VM shit
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.