Gservo
2nd May 2002, 08:44 PM
"MIT prof Stuart Madnick, testifying on MS's behalf, was caught out twice (http://money.cnn.com/2002/05/02/technology/microsoft/index.htm) when a government attorney asked him to name an OS (other than one made by Microsoft) where the browser couldn't be removed. Madnick also faltered on several other questions." Basically he doesn't understand what GNOME and KDE are, and since we're all holier-than-thou know-it-alls around here, we might as well laugh at Microsoft's expense ;)