PDA

View Full Version : News about Protein Change over.....


Jules
27th January 2003, 11:49 AM
Quoted.....Because I'm too tired to think for myself ;)


01/22/2003

- We are fast approaching 10 billion again, and have a 6.5A structure! So congratulations to all. This particular protein was expected to get roughly a 6A structure in a sample of 10 billion so we have come very close to that prediction. We will be changing proteins again next Tuesday afternoon, EST. Also coming soon, a brand new smarter algorithm. Watch here and in the discussion forum for details.

- Results from the CASP5 structure prediction competition have been posted in the results section, with a brief explanation of how to interpret the graphs. In most cases our predictions were in the middle of the pack. This might not sound as good as we had hoped, but it means none of our predictions were THAT bad, and in general all five of our top predictions were of comparable quality, meaning that we were picking out structures consistently. It is also important to keep in mind that of the 13 targets predicted, only T0129, T0139, T0161 and T0181 were truly 'new folds'. Other targets could in some cases be predicted by other means starting from related known structures (though still by no means easy to predict). We still need to go through the structures we generated to see if we submitted the best predictions we could have, or if there were better structures that our scoring function simply failed to pick out. Clearly brute force alone is not sufficient to beat other more intelligent search methods though, and we will shortly be revising the algorithm to work in a more intelligent, iterative sampling approach, which we expect to have a huge effect on the overall performance and efficiency of the sampling.

Have a great Monday :sunshine:

... :yawn: Going back to bed for an hour

Fallguy
27th January 2003, 12:23 PM
Thanks for the read! :)

Fallguy

Rids
27th January 2003, 01:38 PM
Nicely harvested Jules :thumbsup:

bubbadog
27th January 2003, 07:38 PM
Thanks Jules! :kisses:

Jules
27th January 2003, 07:52 PM
:) Figured if I may as well make myself useful if I was gonna be up at that hour anyway :p

Stargazer
27th January 2003, 08:07 PM
:sunshine:

Fingers crossed for a smoothe transition
and another quick protein :D

Fallguy
27th January 2003, 08:52 PM
Holy shi'ite.....
thats tommorow! Eeep, time to flush some buffers I think! :eek:

Fallguy

Dewill
28th January 2003, 04:43 AM
Thanks for the info Jules :)
Anybody know how big it will be,
Hope its not an itsy bitsy teeny weeny one.
Don't like change over day.


Jed ;)

Chelle
28th January 2003, 09:35 PM
Well, they've shut the server down so changeover underway *fingers crossed*

Methinks will be another late night at the office /puts on pot of coffee :p

Terminator
28th January 2003, 09:56 PM
Ummmm, pot of coffee, nah

/termie wanders off to the fridge to get a :cool: :gulp:

BigHandsome
29th January 2003, 12:09 AM
The new protein is 96 aa long. The server had it for a second, but right after I grabbed it the connection went away. It is a fast one.

Gunslinger
29th January 2003, 12:51 AM
A fast one?
Hmmm... might be worth putting a cruncher or two onto it. :)

Only problem is I can't get a connection to the download site to try it. :(

Guess I'll let it settle in for another day or so and try again :rolleyes:

Ni! :gunsling:

Stargazer
29th January 2003, 01:26 AM
??? Fast not hardly. About 30-40% slower in production rates here. :rolleyes:

Chelle
29th January 2003, 02:00 AM
Even though it's a smaller residue protein I'm not finding it much faster.. about 30% slower actually, according to my benchmarks.

zeke
29th January 2003, 02:11 AM
The update is going ok here but the client seems much slower now :(

Jules
29th January 2003, 02:19 AM
Yep, that's what I'm seeing too. I've switched to silent to see if that makes any difference.

wyles
29th January 2003, 03:11 AM
Originally posted by Jules
I've switched to silent to see if that makes any difference.

thatd be a first for you wouldnt it jules??

:p :D

Billy_Bat
29th January 2003, 03:31 AM
I switched my wife's to silent, but so far it hasn't made a difference. :(
This is a funny one, though. A 96 that is "bigger" than a 108. I'm glad to see that it isn't just me. (for once!)

FWC
29th January 2003, 03:43 AM
Yep, I have "The Slows", too. :eek:

Chelle
29th January 2003, 03:49 AM
Well, I think we're changing again in a week, so maybe "the slows" won't last too long :p

Hey Billy_Bat, nice to see you :wave:

Jules
29th January 2003, 04:01 AM
Originally posted by wylie
Originally posted by Jules
I've switched to silent to see if that makes any difference.

thatd be a first for you wouldnt it jules??

:p :D

:smackbum: I can be silent...


Really! :neener:

BigHandsome
29th January 2003, 04:34 AM
Yep, this one is definitely slower. You can't judge 'em by looking at the pretty pictures anymore. One day I will have to actually load the third-party DF tools. My output has gone down the drain.

wyles
29th January 2003, 04:42 AM
Billy!
great to see your smiling face over here!

does anyone know a bit about the science or whatever behind it, that would make a smaller protein slower? more complicated structure or something?

(maybe I should check out the df site eh? :D)